Ten months later, the publishers came out with an edition for young ladies- The Daring Book for Girls.
Come on. Dangerous vs. Daring: which would you rather be? Shouldn't we be pushing girls more towards the dangerous end of the spectrum (and for that matter, bringing boys back toward daring end)?
As if the titles weren't bad enough, the contents of the Girls' book is horrifying; how to frost a cake, secret note-passing skills, and how to turn a perfect cartwheel...
Reviews of this book were less than stellar (we can thank the well-educated, enlightened consumers for lambasting this edition).
My confidence in American progress returned when they introduced The Double-Daring Book for Girls. (Okay, so the title is still lame). Inside lay a treasure of knowledge: how to run a magazine, how to say "no," even how to become the President of the United States.
"This," I thought to myself, "is a book I will let my future daughter read."
As the future president, I feel I should read the double-daring book. But I think "daring" is better than "dangerous" for both boys and girls. Dangerous is just dangerous, daring is brave and fun!
ReplyDelete